Tag Archives: Tribunal’s power to grant stay
VASOOL RAJA
Proverbs are known to be a short cut to wisdom. The wisdom in the following proverbs fit the bill in the background of the recent recovery drive of the In-direct tax department and describes the state of affairs in India’s … Continue reading
Posted in Recovery action
Tagged 1944, 35C, 35F, Allahabad, Allahabad High Court, Appellate Tribunal, binding, binding precedent, extend, extend stay, extension, extension of stay, Hon’ble High Court, inherent, Inherent power, interim order, J. P. Transformers, Karnataka High Court, Kumar Cotton Mills Ltd., power, precedent, proviso, recovery, section 35C, section 35F, stay, sub-section 2A of CEA, sub-section 2A of the Central Excise Act, supreme court, third, third proviso, Tribunal's power to grant stay
Leave a comment
anirudhawake 