Tag Archives: interpretation
PRE DEPOSIT TWIST’S
An in-depth analysis of the recent Larger Bench of the CESTAT concerning mandatory pre deposit under the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Customs Act, 1962 and the Finance Act, 1994. Continue reading
Posted in Appeal, CESTAT, Excise, First appellate authority, pre-deposit, Tribunal;, Uncategorized
Tagged 129E of CA, 35F of CEA, Appeal, Article, Board, CA, CBEC, CEA, Central Excise, CESTAT, clarification, Commissioner (Appeals), Customs, department, First appellate authority, interpretation, pre-deposit, section 129E, section 35F, supreme court, theory, Tribunal;
Leave a comment
anirudhawake 